|
|
Close Page to return to previous page |
|
Dark underbelly of the world's most 'peaceful' countries Some nations that rank well in the Global Peace Index are notorious for violence against women and children. By Riane Eisler from the July 26, 2007 edition of The Christian Science Monitor Pacific Grove, Calif. - The first-ever study ranking countries according to their level of peacefulness, the Global Peace Index, was recently published by the Economist Intelligence Unit. Sensibly, its basic premise is that "peace isn't just the absence of war; it's the absence of violence." The index uses 24 indicators such as how many soldiers are killed, the level of violent crimes, and relations with neighboring countries. Yet it fails to include the most prevalent form of global violence: violence against women and children, often in their own families. To put it mildly, this blind spot makes the index very inaccurate. Glancing at the list shows why. Out of 121 countries studied, the United States ranked 96; Israel was 119. But Libya, Cuba, and China – not exactly paragons of human rights – rank 58, 59, and 60. A closer examination reveals some of the sources of distortion:
The authors of the Global Peace Index expressed hope that it will lead to a new approach to the study of peace. They also said they plan to expand their criteria for future indexes. This expansion must start with major changes in the 10 "measures of societal safety and security." The current index rightly seeks to measure the "level of disrespect for human rights." But according to the report's methodology, this level was based on the "Political Terror Scale" – a scale that ignores the fact that the most ubiquitous human rights violations worldwide are, as a UNICEF report noted 10 years ago, violations of the rights of women and children. That the index fails to include this violence is particularly shocking in light of the longstanding availability of international statistics such as:
Similarly, while the index rightly includes "level of violent crime," it fails to take into account that much of the violence in families is still not considered a crime in many nations – and hence not reported, much less prosecuted, as such. It's unrealistic to expect "cultures of peace" so long as children grow up in families in which the use of violence to impose one's will on others is considered normal, even moral. The good news is that not every one growing up in such families perpetuates violence. The bad news is that many people do – be it in intimate or international relations. Intimate and international violence are inextricably interconnected. But we can only see this once we include in studies of violence the majority: women and children. If we are serious about peace – not just about measuring it but about creating more of it – we have to look at the whole picture. We must pay particular attention to those formative experiences when young people first learn either to respect human rights or to accept human rights violations as just the way things are. Only as we leave behind traditions of domination and violence in the human family will we have solid foundations on which to build global peace. Riane Eisler is the author of "The Chalice and the Blade"
and "The Real Wealth of Nations." She is president of the
Center for Partnership Studies and cofounder of the Spiritual
Alliance to Stop Intimate Violence. Her website is
www.rianeeisler.com .
|
|